Side-by-side comparison · AI Agents & Automation
| Dimension | n8n | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free self-hosted community edition; managed cloud plans start at a modest monthly tier and scale with executions - verify current pricing on the official page | Community edition is free for individuals; enterprise licensing is quoted per robot, user and service and typically runs into substantial annual spend - verify current pricing on the official page |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Rating | β β β β β | β β β β β |
| Best for | technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling | enterprise rpa, invoice and document processing, back-office operations and compliance workflows |
| Category | AI Agents & Automation | AI Agents & Automation |
If your priority is technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling, n8n is the stronger pick. If instead you care more about enterprise rpa, invoice and document processing, back-office operations and compliance workflows, go with UiPath. For most people, trying both on a free tier is the fastest way to decide - they serve the same AI Agents & Automation space but differ in workflow and output style.
It depends on your task. n8n leads on technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling; UiPath is better when you need enterprise rpa, invoice and document processing, back-office operations and compliance workflows. Try both free tiers.
Yes - many users keep one as the daily driver and the other for specific tasks where it is stronger.