Side-by-side comparison · AI Agents & Automation
| Dimension | Flowise | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free and open source for self-hosting; a hosted cloud tier and enterprise options are available at additional cost - verify current pricing on the official page | Free self-hosted community edition; managed cloud plans start at a modest monthly tier and scale with executions - verify current pricing on the official page |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Rating | β β β β β | β β β β β |
| Best for | prototyping rag apps, internal chat assistants, learning llm pipelines and demos | technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling |
| Category | AI Agents & Automation | AI Agents & Automation |
If your priority is prototyping rag apps, internal chat assistants, learning llm pipelines and demos, Flowise is the stronger pick. If instead you care more about technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling, go with n8n. For most people, trying both on a free tier is the fastest way to decide - they serve the same AI Agents & Automation space but differ in workflow and output style.
It depends on your task. Flowise leads on prototyping rag apps, internal chat assistants, learning llm pipelines and demos; n8n is better when you need technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling. Try both free tiers.
Yes - many users keep one as the daily driver and the other for specific tasks where it is stronger.