Side-by-side comparison · AI Agents & Automation
| Dimension | CrewAI | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free open-source Python package; CrewAI Enterprise is quoted separately per deployment - verify current pricing on the official page | Free self-hosted community edition; managed cloud plans start at a modest monthly tier and scale with executions - verify current pricing on the official page |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Rating | β β β β β | β β β β β |
| Best for | developers, research automation, content pipelines and internal agent prototypes | technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling |
| Category | AI Agents & Automation | AI Agents & Automation |
If your priority is developers, research automation, content pipelines and internal agent prototypes, CrewAI is the stronger pick. If instead you care more about technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling, go with n8n. For most people, trying both on a free tier is the fastest way to decide - they serve the same AI Agents & Automation space but differ in workflow and output style.
It depends on your task. CrewAI leads on developers, research automation, content pipelines and internal agent prototypes; n8n is better when you need technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling. Try both free tiers.
Yes - many users keep one as the daily driver and the other for specific tasks where it is stronger.