Side-by-side comparison · AI Agents & Automation
| Dimension | AutoGen | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free and open source under an MIT licence; you pay only for the model API calls or your own compute - verify current pricing on the official page | Free self-hosted community edition; managed cloud plans start at a modest monthly tier and scale with executions - verify current pricing on the official page |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Rating | β β β β β | β β β β β |
| Best for | developer teams, multi-agent research, code generation pipelines and prototypes | technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling |
| Category | AI Agents & Automation | AI Agents & Automation |
If your priority is developer teams, multi-agent research, code generation pipelines and prototypes, AutoGen is the stronger pick. If instead you care more about technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling, go with n8n. For most people, trying both on a free tier is the fastest way to decide - they serve the same AI Agents & Automation space but differ in workflow and output style.
It depends on your task. AutoGen leads on developer teams, multi-agent research, code generation pipelines and prototypes; n8n is better when you need technical teams, self-hosted automation, ai agent workflows and internal tooling. Try both free tiers.
Yes - many users keep one as the daily driver and the other for specific tasks where it is stronger.